Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach to Material on the Characteristics of Two-Dimentional Figures Using the Reog Ponorogo Performance in Elementary Schools

Wiryanto Wiryanto; Ika Rahmawati; Firda Humaira

doi:10.51276/edu.v5i2.848

Authors

Wiryanto Wiryanto Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-4072
Ika Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4202-505X
Firda Humaira Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.848

Keywords:

Mathematics Realistic , Reog , Two-dimensional Figure

Abstract

: It is critical to approach mathematical education correctly. This is because many students believe math is a tough subject to learn. This problem arises because many teachers teach mathematics in abstract terms. This is a qualitative descriptive study using Graveimeiijeir's design research method. The research was designed to prove the truth of the allegations made in the learning trajectory or HLT (Hypothetical Learning Trajectory) and their impact on students' understanding by applying the RME (Realistic Mathematics Education) approach to the material on the characteristics of two-dimensional figures, with Reog Ponorogo performance media and worksheet serving as a guide for student activities. This study was conducted on class 3B students at MI Ma'arif Darul Ulum Pondok. The research topic is a 6-student group in a classroom. The research stages included preparation, execution in the classroom, and data analysis. Based on this research, it can be seen that the stages of learning activities using the RME approach are based on the stages contained in the iceberg theory, namely, stages of real-world situations (situations), models that describe problem situations (model of), models for solving problems (model for), and formal mathematics stages using Reog Ponorogo performance media can make it easier for students to understand material regarding the characteristics of two-dimensional figures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, N. (2017). Problematika Pendidikan di Indonesia. Elementary: Jurnal Iilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 41-47.

Agustyaningrum, N., & Pradanti, P., & Yuliana. (2022). Teori Perkembangan Piaget dan Vygotsky: Bagaimana Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar?. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 5(1), 568-582. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v5i1.1440

Alpian, Y., Anggraeni, S. W., Wiharti, U., & Soleha, N. M. (2019). Pentingnya Pendidikan Bagi Manusia. Jurnal Buana Pengabdian, 1(1), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.36805/jurnalbuanapengabdian.v1i1.581

Amelia, C. (2019). Problematika Pendidikan di Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.

Anggraini, M., Fauzan, A., & Musdi, E. (2022). Pengembangan Desain Pembelajaran Topik Peluang Berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1612

Anggraini, Y. (2021). Analisis Persiapan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2415-2422. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1241

Fatmahanik, U. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika dalam Kebudayaan Reog Ponorogo (Kajian Ethnomathematics). In Proceeding: International Conference on Islamic Studies (ICIS) IAIN Ponorogo, 285-299. https://doi.org/10.21154/.v1i0.20

Fitri, S. F. N. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1617-1620. https://doi.org/10.21154/.v1i0.20

Fitri, Y. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. THEOREMS (The Journal of Mathematics), 1(2), 185-195.

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from A Learning Design Perspective. In Educational Design Research. Routledge.

Khotimah, S. H., & Asâ, M. (2020). Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28568

Marinda, L. (2020). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget dan Problematikanya pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa': Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), 116-152. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26

Parnabhakti, L., & Ulfa, M. (2020). Perkembangan Matematika dalam Filsafat dan Aliran Formalisme yang Terkandung dalam Filsafat Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik, 1(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v1i1.154

Primasari, I. F. N. D., Zulela, Z., & Fahrurrozi, F. (2021). Model Mathematics Realistic Education (RME) pada Materi Pecahan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 1888-1899. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1115

Rahmaniar, E., Maemonah, M., & Mahmudah, I. (2022). Kritik terhadap Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget pada Tahap Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1). 531-539.

Rokhmawati, L. N., Ratnaningsih, N., & Ni'mah, K. (2023). Aturan Penjumlahan dan Perkalian dalam Kaidah Pencacahan: Bagaimanakah Desain Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Berbasis RME?. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 6(3), 937-950. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17321

Setyawan, D. (2020). Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Berbantuan Media Konkrit. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v4i2.4473

Sundawan, M. D. (2016). Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme dan Model Pembelajaran Langsung. LOGIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Lemlit Unswagati Cirebon, 16(1), 1-11.

Warsito, Nuraini, Y., & Sukirwan. (2019). Desain Pembelajaran Pecahan melalui Pendekatan Realistik di Kelas V. Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 25–36.

Widodo, S. (2019). Membangun pendidikan antikorupsi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpd.v10i1.11142

Yeni, E. M. (2015). Kesulitan Belajar Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. JUPENDAS (Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar), 2(2), 1-10.